Key result
PARMA 5 computer-assisted dosage yielded a non-significant reduction in overall clinical events vs manual dosage, but reduced events in patients with DVT/PE.
Why the study?
Does PARMA 5 computer-assisted oral anticoagulant dosage improve clinical events and time in target INR range compared to manual dosage in patients requiring oral anticoagulation?
RCT (n=10,421)
randomised
Yes
Does PARMA 5 computer-assisted oral anticoagulant dosage improve clinical events and time in target INR range compared to manual dosage in patients requiring oral anticoagulation?
Computer-assisted oral anticoagulant dosage with PARMA 5 is safe, effective, and improves time in therapeutic range compared to manual dosage by experienced staff.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support PARMA 5 in DVT/PE; extends RCT evidence on computer dosing to clinical events.
To meet growing demand for oral anticoagulation worldwide there has been increased dependence on computer-assistance in dosage although the safety and effectiveness of any of the individual computer-assisted dosage programs has not previously been established. This randomised multicentre clinical end-point study assessed a new version of the PARMA 5 program. It compared PARMA 5 safety and effectiveness with manual dosage by experienced medical staff at 19 centres with a known interest in oral anticoagulation. Target recruitment was 8000 patient-years, randomised to medical staff or PARMA-5 assisted dosage. Safety and effectiveness of the PARMA 5 program was compared with manual dosage. A total of 10,421 patients were recruited (15,369 patient-years) in the 5-year study. International normalised ratio (INR) tests numbered 167,791 with manual and 160,078 with PARMA 5 dosage. With parma 5 there was overall a non-significant reduction in clinical events but in the 2542 patients with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, clinical events were significantly reduced (P = 0.005). Success in achieving 'time in target INR range' was also significantly greater with PARMA 5 compared with the dosage by experienced medical staff. This study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of PARMA 5-assisted dosage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poller et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in oral anticoagulation (n=10,421). PARMA 5 computer-assisted dosage vs. manual dosage by experienced medical staff was evaluated on clinical events. PARMA 5 computer-assisted dosage yielded a non-significant reduction in overall clinical events vs manual dosage, but reduced events in patients with DVT/PE.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: