Key result
Coronary revascularization in women is linked to higher mortality than in men despite modern improvements.
Why the study?
Does coronary revascularization have different outcomes, risks, and complication rates in women compared to men?
Does coronary revascularization have different outcomes, risks, and complication rates in women compared to men?
This review highlights the critical need for increased inclusion of women in interventional cardiology trials to establish sex-specific evidence and optimize revascularization outcomes.
Women warrant heightened risk awareness during revascularization; leaves open sex-specific strategies pending dedicated inclusive trials.
Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death in men and women worldwide. It is still considered a disease of men and there has been little recognition of its importance in women. Gender differences exist in acute and chronic ischaemia in terms of clinical manifestations, investigations and treatment. There are clear gender differences in coronary revascularisation with a higher mortality seen in women. At the time a woman presents with coronary artery disease she is older and has more co-morbid factors. Furthermore, women have smaller coronary arteries making them more difficult to revascularise. In recent years there has been a general trend towards improved outcomes in women undergoing both surgical and percutaneous coronary intervention. The increasing use of drug eluting stents and adjunctive medical treatment as well as the use of off-pump bypass surgery needs further evaluation in terms of gender differences. This article reviews the current literature on coronary revascularisation in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghada Mikhail (2006) conducted a review in Coronary heart disease. Coronary revascularization vs. Men (gender comparison) or conservative therapy was evaluated. Coronary revascularization in women is associated with a higher baseline risk and historically higher mortality than in men, though outcomes have improved with newer surgical and percutaneous techniques.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: