Key result
Patients managed in a heart failure clinic demonstrated significantly higher disease knowledge scores compared to those receiving usual care (7.9 vs. 5.7; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Is the 10-item Patient knowledge questionnaire a valid and reliable tool to measure knowledge in heart failure patients?
Population
82 heart failure patients (42 from Heart failure clinic and 40 receiving usual care)
Comparison
10-item Patient knowledge questionnaire vs Usual care vs Heart failure clinic
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
HF clinic care associates with higher knowledge; hypothesis-generating for education benefits, RCTs needed to assess outcomes.
Cross-Sectional (n=82)
Is the 10-item Patient knowledge questionnaire a valid and reliable tool to measure knowledge in heart failure patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.9% vs 5.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
The 10-item Patient knowledge questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessing disease-specific knowledge in heart failure patients.
Lainščak et al. (2005) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=82). Heart failure clinic care vs. Usual care was evaluated on Overall score on the Patient knowledge questionnaire (p=<0.001). Patients managed in a heart failure clinic demonstrated significantly higher disease knowledge scores compared to those receiving usual care (7.9 vs. 5.7; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: