Why the study?
Does an active and aggressive preventive strategy reduce infarct size and mortality in patients with acute evolving myocardial infarction?
Does an active and aggressive preventive strategy reduce infarct size and mortality in patients with acute evolving myocardial infarction?
An active, aggressive approach to acute evolving myocardial infarction holds the promise of reducing infarct size, complications, and mortality compared to older conservative strategies.
May support aggressive strategies in acute MI; hypothesis-generating pending randomized trials.
Recent studies on pathogenetic mechanisms, supplemented by findings in clinical trials point the way to a logical approach to acute evolving myocardial infarction. This is designed in the earliest stage to limit infarction through reduction in myocardial oxygen demands, improvement in collateral blood supply and dissolution of coronary thrombus, to prevent in a later stage coronary reocclusion through administration of antiplatelet agents, and then to prevent infarct expansion through reduction in ventricular wall tension throughout the period of repair. Application of such an approach holds the promise of reducing infarct size and all the complications of infarction, as well as short and long-term mortality. The approach is active and aggressive, and contrasts with the approach applied a decade ago, where infarction was accepted as inevitable and therapies were reserved for managing its complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carroll et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: