Why the study?
Does a novel esophageal electrode system lower countershock impedance compared to standard transthoracic placement in patients with tachyarrhythmias?
Does a novel esophageal electrode system lower countershock impedance compared to standard transthoracic placement in patients with tachyarrhythmias?
A novel esophageal electrode system provides significantly lower countershock impedance compared to standard transthoracic placement, with both being influenced by patient anthropometrics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lower esophageal impedance may aid defibrillation; hypothesis-generating for esophageal electrodes in tachyarrhythmias.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of a novel esophageal electrode system for countershock of atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, with particular regard to the measurement of transesophageal and transthoracic impedances and their association with anthropometric variables. METHODS: Transesophageal cardioversion was attempted during 131 episodes of arrhythmia in 105 patients (including 109 episodes of atrial fibrillation). The esophageal system also used in 29 patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies for investigation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Transesophageal and transthoracic impedances were estimated during passage of a high-frequency, low-amplitude current between the respective electrodes. Impedance estimates were associated with anthropometric measurements using linear regression (least-squares method). RESULTS: In the group of patients undergoing attempted transesophageal cardioversion, the mean estimated transesophageal impedance of 52.6 +/- 11.7 omega was significantly lower than the mean estimated transthoracic impedance of 63.1 +/- 16.4 omega (n = 104, p < 0.01). For all the patients, transesophageal impedance was associated with weight, body mass index, and chest circumference (all r > or = 0.65, p < 0.01). Transthoracic impedance was associated with the same factors (all r > or = 0.55, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This esophageal electrode system results in lower impedance values for countershock between the esophagus and the cutaneous cardiac apex in comparison with standard transthoracic cutaneous electrode placement. Both techniques are dependent on anthropometric factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McKeown et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: