Key result
Addressing sex and gender disparities in clinical electrophysiology requires a multifaceted approach including sex-stratified research, quality improvement programs, and implicit bias training.
Why the study?
Sex and gender influence the epidemiology and outcomes of cardiac arrhythmias, leading to disparities observed in clinical electrophysiology practice.
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Supports bias training and stratified analyses in electrophysiology; leaves open optimal implementation strategies for prospective trials.
Implementing strategies such as implicit bias training, shared decision-making, and quality improvement initiatives is essential to eliminate sex and gender disparities in clinical electrophysiology.
Amuthan et al. (2022) conducted a review in Cardiac arrhythmias. Strategies to eliminate sex gaps (e.g., quality improvement, implicit bias training, shared decision-making) was evaluated. Addressing sex and gender disparities in clinical electrophysiology requires a multifaceted approach including sex-stratified research, quality improvement programs, and implicit bias training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: