Why the study?
Personalised models of care addressing gender-specific differences in cardiovascular symptom patterns, diagnosis, and treatment timing remain suboptimal in clinical practice.
Design
Editorial
Key result
Gender differences in the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular conditions persist in clinical practice, highlighting the need for more personalized, gender-specific models of care.
Authors
Loading...
Gender gaps in CVD care demand clinician attention to bias; leaves open development of validated gender-specific protocols.
Highlights the persistent gender gap in the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular diseases, calling for more personalized, gender-specific models of care.
Hendriks et al. (2024) conducted an editorial in Cardiovascular disease. Gender differences in the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular conditions persist in clinical practice, highlighting the need for more personalized, gender-specific models of care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: