Key result
The angle-corrected force on reconstituted thin filaments was approximately 1.5 times larger (4.3 pN/μm) than that on pure actin filaments (2.8 pN/μm) under vertical forces in an in vitro motility assay.
Absolute Event Rate: 4.3% vs 2.8%
Reconstitution of tropomyosin and troponin on actin filaments increases the active force generation by approximately 1.5 times compared to pure actin filaments under vertical forces.
No immediate clinical implications; extends in vitro evidence on thin filament regulation and leaves translation open.
The interaction between actin filaments and myosin molecular motors is a power source of a variety of cellular functions including cell division, cell motility, and muscular contraction. In vitro motility assay examines actin filaments interacting with myosin molecules that are adhered to a substrate (e.g., glass surface). This assay has been the standard method of studying the molecular mechanisms of contraction under an optical microscope. While the force generation has been measured through an optically trapped bead to which an actin filament is attached, a force vector vertical to the glass surface has been largely ignored with the in vitro motility assay. The vertical vector is created by the gap (distance) between the trapped bead and the glass surface. In this report, we propose a method to estimate the angle between the actin filament and the glass surface by optically determining the gap size. This determination requires a motorized stage in a standard epi-fluorescence microscope equipped with optical tweezers. This facile method is applied to force measurements using both pure actin filaments, and thin filaments reconstituted from actin, tropomyosin and troponin. We find that the angle-corrected force per unit filament length in the active condition (pCa = 5.0) decreases as the angle between the filament and the glass surface increases; i.e. as the force in the vertical direction increases. At the same time, we demonstrate that the force on reconstituted thin filaments is approximately 1.5 times larger than that on pure actin filaments. The range of angles we tested was between 11° and 36° with the estimated measurement error less than 6°. These results suggest the ability of cytoplasmic tropomyosin isoforms maintaining actomyosin active force to stabilize cytoskeletal architecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishii et al. (2018) studied this question. Reconstituted thin filaments (actin, tropomyosin, troponin) vs. Pure actin filaments was evaluated on Angle-corrected force per unit filament length in the active condition (pCa = 5.0). The angle-corrected force on reconstituted thin filaments was approximately 1.5 times larger (4.3 pN/μm) than that on pure actin filaments (2.8 pN/μm) under vertical forces in an in vitro motility assay.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: