Key result
ICE-guided minimal-fluoroscopy ablation will be compared to a traditional approach in a planned randomized controlled trial of 432 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
The feasibility and safety of ICE-guided minimal/zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for AF have been reported, but its efficacy, safety, and impact on lab staff occupational hazards needed prospective evaluation.
Does intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided minimal-fluoroscopy ablation improve freedom from AF recurrence and reduce occupational hazards in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=432)
1:1
Yes
Does intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided minimal-fluoroscopy ablation improve freedom from AF recurrence and reduce occupational hazards in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
The PAF-ICE trial is designed to evaluate whether ICE-guided minimal-fluoroscopy ablation is non-inferior to traditional fluoroscopy-guided ablation for paroxysmal AF, while potentially reducing occupational radiation hazards.
Planned PAF-ICE RCT will test non-inferiority of ICE-guided minimal-fluoroscopy ablation; leaves open whether efficacy is preserved with reduced occupational radiation exposure.
The feasibility and safety of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) using a minimal/zero-fluoroscopy approach have recently been reported. This approach helps to reduce ionizing radiation exposure and orthopedic complications resulting from using lead aprons. The objectives of this planned prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) (paroxysmal AF (PAF)-ICE trial; ChiCTR2000033624) are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICE-guided minimal-fluoroscopy ablation in patients with PAF and the impact on occupational hazards among lab staff. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 2 groups: minimal fluoroscopy group ( n = 216) and traditional approach group ( n = 216). In the minimal fluoroscopy group, an ICE catheter will be used for geometry/anatomic construction, transseptal puncture, catheter tracking, and effusion monitoring. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) will be performed using an open-irrigated radiofrequency SmartTouch Surround Flow or SmartTouch catheter (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, California, USA), and confirmed by a multipolar Lasso or PentaRay catheter (Biosense Webster). In the traditional approach group, an ICE catheter will not be used. Transseptal puncture will be performed under fluoroscopic guidance, with all geometries constructed by mapping the catheters. The primary efficacy endpoint is freedom from AF recurrence (without antiarrhythmic medications) at 12 months after ablation. Other endpoints include duration of lead apron use, measures of intra-procedural efficiency, and peri-procedural complications. This RCT will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICE-guided minimal-fluoroscopy ablation in patients with PAF, also evaluate the benefits to lab staff (regarding reducing occupational hazards) related to this “minimal/zero-fluoroscopy” and “leadless” mode.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (n=432). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided minimal-fluoroscopy ablation vs. Traditional approach (fluoroscopic guidance without ICE) was evaluated on Freedom from AF recurrence (without antiarrhythmic medications) at 12 months after ablation. ICE-guided minimal-fluoroscopy ablation will be compared to a traditional approach in a planned randomized controlled trial of 432 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: