Why the study?
Does intravenous atropine administration provide a reproducible method for deriving individual systolic time interval versus heart rate regression equations in normal male subjects?
Does intravenous atropine administration provide a reproducible method for deriving individual systolic time interval versus heart rate regression equations in normal male subjects?
Intravenous atropine provides a satisfactory and reproducible method for deriving individual systolic time interval versus heart rate regression equations over a period of weeks.
Atropine-derived individual regressions may aid research corrections for systolic time intervals; leaves applicability to patients open.
Systolic time intervals (STI) were recorded in six normal male subjects over a period of 3 weeks. On one day per week, each subject received incremental doses of atropine intravenously to increase heart rate, allowing the determination of individual STI v HR regression equations. On the other days STI were recorded with the subjects resting, in the supine position. 2. There were highly significant regression relationships between heart rate and both LVET and QS2, but not between heart rate and PEP. 3. The regression relationships showed little intra-subject variability, but a large degree of inter-subject variability: they proved adequate to correct the STI for the daily fluctuations in heart rate. 4. Administration of small doses of atropine intravenously provides a satisfactory and convenient method of deriving individual STI v HR regression equations which can be applied over a period of weeks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelman et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: