Higher annual operation volumes were associated with significantly lower mortality in both elective (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.65-0.67) and ruptured (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.73-0.82) AAA repair.
Meta-Analysis (n=467,095)
Odds Ratio: 0.66 (95% CI 0.65–0.67)
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the volume-outcome relationship for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery and quantified critical volume thresholds. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched for articles on the operation volume-outcome relationship in elective and ruptured AAA surgery. UK Hospital Episode Statistics data were also considered. Elective and ruptured AAA repairs were dealt with separately. The data were meta-analysed, and the odds ratios (95 per cent confidence interval) for mortality at higher- and lower-volume hospitals were compared. Volume thresholds were identified from each paper. RESULTS: The analysis included 421,299 elective and 45,796 ruptured AAA operations. Significant relationships between mortality and annual volume were noted for both groups. Overall, the weighted odds ratio was 0.66 (0.65 to 0.67) for elective repair at a threshold of 43 AAAs per annum and 0.78 (0.73 to 0.82) for ruptured aneurysm repair at a threshold of 15 AAAs per annum, both in favour of high-volume institutions. CONCLUSION: Higher annual operation volumes are associated with significantly lower mortality in both elective and ruptured AAA repair. This suggests that AAA surgery should be performed only at higher-volume centres.
Holt et al. (Fri,) conducted a meta-analysis in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (n=467,095). Higher annual operation volumes vs. Lower annual operation volumes was evaluated on Mortality in elective AAA repair (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.65-0.67). Higher annual operation volumes were associated with significantly lower mortality in both elective (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.65-0.67) and ruptured (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.73-0.82) AAA repair.