Key result
DOACs show no quality-of-life benefit over warfarin in patients with prior venous thromboembolism.
Why the study?
Although direct oral anticoagulants are associated with favorable treatment satisfaction, few studies have assessed whether quality of life differs between DOAC and warfarin users with venous thromboembolism.
Does direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use improve health-related quality of life compared to warfarin in adults with a history of venous thromboembolism?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,230)
Yes
Does direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use improve health-related quality of life compared to warfarin in adults with a history of venous thromboembolism?
Absolute Event Rate: 39.2% vs 38.3%
p-value: p=0.24
Despite greater convenience, the use of DOACs does not translate to clinically significant improvements in overall health-related quality of life compared to warfarin in patients treated for VTE.
Does not support preferring DOACs for HRQoL in VTE; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is commonly treated with oral anticoagulants, including warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Although DOACs are associated with favorable treatment satisfaction, few studies have assessed whether quality of life differs between DOAC and warfarin users. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We invited adults enrolled in two California-based integrated health care delivery systems and with a history of VTE between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2018 to complete a survey on their experience with anticoagulants. Health-related quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the RAND 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which measures QOL in 2 general component scores (physical and mental). We used multivariable linear regression to compare mean QOL component scores between DOAC-users and warfarin-users, adjusting for patient and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 2230 patients (43.1 % women and 31.8 % >75 years of age) taking anticoagulants answered at least 1 question on the SF-36, 975 taking DOACs and 1255 taking warfarin. After adjustment for patient-level factors, there were no significant differences in either physical component scores (39.2 v 38.3, p = 0.24) or mental component scores (48.5 v 49.0, p = 0.42) between DOAC and warfarin users. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related QOL did not significantly differ between DOAC and warfarin users with a history of VTE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Venous thromboembolism (VTE) (n=2,230). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) of the SF-36 (p=0.24). In patients with a history of venous thromboembolism, DOAC exposure did not significantly improve physical or mental health-related quality of life compared to warfarin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: