Key result
Natriuretic peptide testing, including BNP and NT-proBNP, serves as a key tool for the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of heart failure in both outpatient and inpatient settings.
Why the study?
Does natriuretic peptide testing improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of heart failure in inpatient and outpatient settings?
Does natriuretic peptide testing improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of heart failure in inpatient and outpatient settings?
This review summarizes the utility of natriuretic peptides (BNP and NT-proBNP) in diagnosing, prognosticating, and guiding therapy for heart failure patients.
Supports natriuretic peptide testing in heart failure care; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials.
Acutely destabilized heart failure is one of the most common diagnoses in the modern health care system. It has high hospital readmission rates and significant short-, medium-, and long-term mortality, likely due to misdiagnosis or failure to assess adequate treatment before discharge. Cardiac biomarkers such as B-type natriuretic peptide and its amino terminal cleavage equivalent N-terminal fragment have rapidly become one of the key tools in the diagnosis and guidance of heart failure therapy. In this article, we shall review the data on the current use of the natriuretic peptides for the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of heart failure in both the outpatient and inpatient settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Green et al. (2009) conducted a review in Heart failure. Natriuretic peptide testing (BNP and NT-proBNP) was evaluated. Natriuretic peptide testing, including BNP and NT-proBNP, serves as a key tool for the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of heart failure in both outpatient and inpatient settings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: