Key result
Telemedicine showed limited evidence for controlling hypertension in known patients and very limited evidence for confirming a suspected diagnosis or reducing healthcare costs.
Why the study?
Does telemedicine improve health outcomes, patient compliance, or reduce costs in patients with hypertension?
Systematic Review
Does telemedicine improve health outcomes, patient compliance, or reduce costs in patients with hypertension?
Telemedicine shows limited evidence for controlling hypertension and reducing healthcare costs, highlighting the need for further evaluation.
Current evidence does not support routine telemedicine adoption for hypertension; leaves open the need for rigorous trials on outcomes and costs.
To assess what is known about the use of telemedicine in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Four electronic databases were searched for published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing telemedicine and conventional interventions for hypertension in which the outcome measure used was one or more of: health outcome, proxy health outcome, patient compliance or cost. Studies identified were subjected to narrative review. Thirty three papers were identified reporting twenty RCTs. Of these, nine were suitable for inclusion. There is limited evidence that telemedicine can contribute to controlling hypertension in known patients. There is very limited evidence that it can contribute to confirming a suspected diagnosis of hypertension or to reducing healthcare costs. The use and evaluation of telemedicine in the diagnosis and management of hypertension is underdeveloped.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grange et al. (2009) conducted a systematic review in Hypertension. Telemedicine vs. Conventional interventions was evaluated on Health outcome, proxy health outcome, patient compliance or cost. Telemedicine showed limited evidence for controlling hypertension in known patients and very limited evidence for confirming a suspected diagnosis or reducing healthcare costs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: