Key result
Controlled breathing normalized to 80% of the individual's spontaneous breathing rate significantly increased cardiac vagal modulation compared to baseline (HFnu 67.5% vs. 48.2%, p < 0.0001).
Why the study?
Does a controlled breathing protocol normalized to individual spontaneous breathing rate improve vagal activation compared to standard fixed-rate breathing in healthy subjects?
Does a controlled breathing protocol normalized to individual spontaneous breathing rate improve vagal activation compared to standard fixed-rate breathing in healthy subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: 67.5% vs 48.2%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Normalizing controlled breathing rates to an individual's spontaneous breathing rate, specifically at 80% of baseline, provides more consistent vagal activation than standard fixed-rate breathing protocols.
Hypothesis-generating for individualized breathing to enhance vagal tone; requires randomized validation before clinical consideration.
Controlled breathing maneuver is being widely applied for cardiovascular autonomic control evaluation and cardiac vagal activation through reduction of breathing rate (BR). However, this maneuver presented contradictory results depending on the protocol and the chosen BR. These variations may be related to the individual intrinsic profile baseline sympathetic tonus, as described before by others. In this study, we evaluated the effect of controlled breathing maneuver on cardiovascular autonomic control in 26 healthy subjects allocated into two protocols: 1) controlled breathing in three different rates (10, 15 and 20 breaths/min) and 2) controlled breathing in rates normalized by the individual spontaneous breathing rate (SBR) at 100%, 80%, 70% and 50%. Our results showed autonomic responses favorable to vagal modulation with the lower BR maneuvers. Nevertheless, while this activation was variable using the standard protocol, all participants of the normalized protocol demonstrated an increase of vagal modulation at 80% BR (HFnu 80%= 67.5% vs 48.2%, p$<$0.0001). These results suggest that controlled breathing protocols to induce vagal activation should consider the SBR, being limited to values moderately lower than the baseline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Souza et al. (2018) studied Healthy (n=26). Controlled breathing normalized by spontaneous breathing rate vs. Baseline spontaneous breathing was evaluated on Cardiac vagal modulation (HFnu) (p=<0.0001). Controlled breathing normalized to 80% of the individual's spontaneous breathing rate significantly increased cardiac vagal modulation compared to baseline (HFnu 67.5% vs. 48.2%, p < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: