Key result
Catheter delivery system efficacy remains under study vs stylet delivery for ventricular lead placement.
Why the study?
Trainees often face difficulty delivering leads to the right ventricle during pacemaker implantation, prompting a comparison between catheter and stylet delivery systems.
Does the catheter delivery system reduce the total number of attempts needed for right ventricular lead placement compared to the stylet delivery system in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation?
RCT (n=100)
1:1 ratio, based on a minimization scheme with stratification by the operator
Does the catheter delivery system reduce the total number of attempts needed for right ventricular lead placement compared to the stylet delivery system in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation?
This study protocol describes an upcoming trial comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement by trainees.
Caution against routine adoption until completion; leaves open whether catheter delivery improves trainee success in RV lead placement.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular lead placement is one of the fundamental procedures during pacemaker implantation through the subclavian vein. Currently, there are two techniques to deliver the lead to the right ventricle: the catheter and stylet delivery systems. Surgeons, especially trainees in the early stage of training, are known to face difficulty while delivering the lead to the right ventricle. The objective of this study is to investigate and compare the two techniques of lead delivery by trainees in patients who are scheduled to undergo pacemaker implantation. METHODS: This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. One-hundred patients who were scheduled to undergo pacemaker implantation with a right ventricular lead will be randomized such that the pacemaker can be implanted via either the catheter delivery system or the stylet delivery system at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the total number of attempts needed to place the lead in the ideal position. Secondary endpoints are the efficacy and safety of the implantation procedure. All implantation procedures will be performed by trainees under the supervision of expert cardiologists. RESULTS: The results of this study are currently under investigation. CONCLUSION: This will be the first clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system during the implantation of the ventricular lead in pacemaker implantation. Our findings are expected to improve the lead implantation procedure by providing information about which delivery system to choose in which situation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamagata et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Patients scheduled to undergo pacemaker implantation with a right ventricular lead (n=100). Catheter delivery system (CDS) vs. Stylet delivery system (SDS) was evaluated on Total number of attempts needed to place the lead in the ideal position. The catheter delivery system's efficacy and safety compared to the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement are currently under investigation with no quantitative results reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: