Key result
The delivery catheter system achieved a higher success rate of right ventricular lead placement to the septum compared to the stylet system (78% vs. 50%; P=0.024).
Why the study?
No randomized controlled trial had evaluated the difference in right ventricular lead placement accuracy to the septum between the stylet and delivery catheter systems.
Does the delivery catheter system improve the success rate of RV lead tip placement to the RV septum compared to the stylet system in patients with pacemaker indications of atrioventricular block?
RCT (n=70)
Yes
Does the delivery catheter system improve the success rate of RV lead tip placement to the RV septum compared to the stylet system in patients with pacemaker indications of atrioventricular block?
The delivery catheter system significantly improves the accuracy of right ventricular septal lead placement and results in a narrower paced QRS width compared to the conventional stylet system.
: Supports using delivery catheters to optimize RV septal pacing and preserve ventricular synchrony.
AIMS: Although the delivery catheter system for pacemaker-lead implantation is a new alternative to the stylet system, no randomized controlled trial has addressed the difference in right ventricular (RV) lead placement accuracy to the septum between the stylet and the delivery catheter systems. This multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to prove the efficacy of the delivery catheter system for accurate delivery of RV lead to the septum. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this trial, 70 patients (mean age 78 ± 11 years; 30 men) with pacemaker indications of atrioventricular block were randomized to the delivery catheter or the stylet groups. Right ventricular lead tip positions were assessed using cardiac computed tomography within 4 weeks of pacemaker implantation. Lead tip positions were classified into RV septum, anterior/posterior edge of the RV septal wall, and RV free wall. The primary endpoint was the success rate of RV lead tip placement to the RV septum. RESULTS: Right ventricular leads were implanted as per allocation in all patients. The delivery catheter group had higher success rate of RV lead deployment to the septum (78 vs. 50%; P = 0.024) and narrower paced QRS width (130 ± 19 vs. 142 ± 15 ms P = 0.004) than those in the stylet group. However, there was no significant difference in procedure time [91 (IQR 68-119) vs. 85 (59-118) min; P = 0.488] or the incidence of RV lead dislodgment (0 vs. 3%; P = 0.486). CONCLUSION: The delivery catheter system can achieve a higher success rate of RV lead placement to the RV septum and narrower paced QRS width than the stylet system. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs042200014 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs042200014).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naruse et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Atrioventricular block with pacemaker indications (n=70). Delivery catheter system vs. Stylet system was evaluated on Success rate of RV lead tip placement to the RV septum (p=0.024). The delivery catheter system achieved a higher success rate of right ventricular lead placement to the septum compared to the stylet system (78% vs. 50%; P=0.024).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: