Key result
This study protocol describes a randomized trial of 70 patients to evaluate whether a delivery catheter system improves right ventricular septal lead placement success compared to a stylet system.
Why the study?
The success rate of RV septal lead placement using a stylet system is low, and no RCT has evaluated lead placement accuracy using stylet versus delivery catheter systems.
Does a delivery catheter system improve the success rate of right ventricular lead placement on the RV septum compared to a stylet system in patients with atrioventricular block requiring a pacemaker?
RCT (n=70)
single-blind
randomised
Yes
Does a delivery catheter system improve the success rate of right ventricular lead placement on the RV septum compared to a stylet system in patients with atrioventricular block requiring a pacemaker?
This study protocol describes a randomized trial to evaluate whether a delivery catheter system improves the accuracy of right ventricular septal lead placement compared to a stylet system.
Delivery catheter use was associated with higher septal placement success; leaves open whether this reduces cardiomyopathy risk.
INTRODUCTION: Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy occasionally occurs in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation. Although compared with right ventricular (RV) apical pacing, RV septal pacing can attenuate left ventricular dyssynchrony; the success rate of lead placement on the RV septum using the stylet system is low. Additionally, no randomised controlled trial has addressed the issue regarding the accuracy of RV lead placement on the RV septum using the stylet and delivery catheter systems. This study hypothesises that a newly available delivery catheter system can improve the accuracy of RV lead placement on the RV septum. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a multicentre, prospective, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial, 70 patients with pacemaker indication owing to atrioventricular block will be randomised to either the delivery catheter or stylet group before the pacemaker implantation procedure. The position of the RV lead tip will be assessed using ECG-gated cardiac CT in all patients within 4 weeks after pacemaker implantation. Lead tip positions are classified into three groups: (1) RV septum, (2) anterior/posterior edge of the RV septal wall and (3) RV free wall. The primary endpoint will be the success rate of RV lead tip placement on the RV septum, which will be evaluated using cardiac CT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be conducted according to the stipulations of the Helsinki Declaration and the institutional review board of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine. The results of the study will be disseminated at several research conferences and will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs042200014; Pre-results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naruse et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in pacemaker indication owing to atrioventricular block (n=70). Delivery catheter system vs. Stylet system was evaluated on Success rate of RV lead tip placement on the RV septum. This study protocol describes a randomized trial of 70 patients to evaluate whether a delivery catheter system improves right ventricular septal lead placement success compared to a stylet system.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: