Key result
Pacing postconditioning improved cardiac function and reduced infarct size following ischemia-reperfusion injury, effects that were attenuated by Mas receptor or eNOS antagonism.
Why the study?
Does pacing postconditioning and ANG-(1-7) treatment improve cardiac function and reduce infarct size in isolated hearts subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury?
Does pacing postconditioning and ANG-(1-7) treatment improve cardiac function and reduce infarct size in isolated hearts subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury?
Pacing postconditioning protects against ischemia-reperfusion injury via mechanisms involving the ANG-(1-7)/Mas receptor/NO pathway.
Pacing postconditioning may protect via ANG-(1-7)/Mas/NO signaling; leaves open clinical translation from animal ischemia-reperfusion models.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of the ANG-(1-7) receptor (Mas) and nitric oxide (NO) in pacing postconditiong (PPC)-mediated cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cardiac contractility and hemodynamics were assessed using a modified Langendorff system, cardiac damage was assessed by measuring infarct size and creatinine kinase levels, and levels of phosphorylated and total endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) were determined by Western blot analysis. Isolated hearts were subjected to 30 min of regional ischemia, produced by fixed position ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery, followed by 30 min of reperfusion (n = 6). Hearts were also subjected to PPC (three cycles of 30 s of left ventricular pacing alternated with 30 s of right atrial pacing) and/or treated during reperfusion with ANG-(1-7), N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester, or the Mas antagonist (d-Ala7)-ANG I/II (1-7). The PPC-mediated improvement in cardiac contractility and hemodyanamics, cardiac damage, and eNOS phosphorylation were significantly attenuated upon treatment with (d-Ala7)-ANG I/II (1-7) or N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester. Treatment with ANG-(1-7) improved cardiac function and reduced infarct size and creatinine kinase levels; however, the effects of ANG-(1-7) were not additive with PPC. In conclusion, these data provide novel insights into the cardioprotective mechanisms of PPC in that they involve the Mas receptor and eNOS and further suggest a potential therapeutic role for ANG-(1-7) in cardiac ischemic injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abwainy et al. (2015) studied Ischemia-reperfusion injury (n=6). Pacing postconditioning (PPC) vs. Ischemia-reperfusion without PPC or with antagonists was evaluated on Cardiac contractility, hemodynamics, infarct size, creatinine kinase levels, and eNOS phosphorylation. Pacing postconditioning improved cardiac function and reduced infarct size following ischemia-reperfusion injury, effects that were attenuated by Mas receptor or eNOS antagonism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: