PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2008Heart439 citations

The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape

View Full Paper
BSBelinda SchaeferMLMark LewinKSK K Stout

Key Result

Type 1 BAV is associated with normal aortic shape (60% vs 32%), whereas Type 2 is associated with ascending aorta dilatation (54% vs 35%) and myxomatous mitral valves (13% vs 2.6%).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=191)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

P
Population
191 adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve evaluated to establish a phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape.
O
Outcome
Assessment of leaflet morphology; valve function; aortic shape and dimensionssurrogate

Bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes can be classified by both leaflet morphology and aortic shape, with distinct clinical associations for right-left versus right-non-coronary cusp fusion.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 60% vs 32%

p-value: p=<0.01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish a classification of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) that includes both leaflet morphology and aortic shape. SETTING: Two academic medical centres of the University of Washington, Seattle. PATIENTS: 191 adult patients with BAV. INTERVENTIONS: Review of clinical data and transthoracic echocardiograms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of leaflet morphology; valve function; aortic shape and dimensions. RESULTS: We identified three morphologies: type 1, fusion of right and left coronary cusp (n = 152); type 2, right and non-coronary fusion (n = 39); and type 3, left and non-coronary fusion (n = 1). Comparing type 1 and 2 BAV, there were no significant differences in age, height, weight, blood pressure or aortic valve function. Type 1 was more common in men (69 vs 45%). The aortic sinuses were larger in type 1, while type 2 had larger arch dimensions. Myxomatous mitral valves were more common in type 2 BAV (13% vs 2.6%, p<0.05). Three aortic shapes were defined: normal (N), sinus effacement (E), and ascending dilatation (A). Comparing type 1 to type 2 BAV, shape N was more common in type 1 (60% vs 32%), and type A was more common in type 2 (35% vs 54%,); type E was rare (p<0.01 across all groups). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive BAV phenotype includes aortic shape. Type 1 BAV is associated with male gender and normal aortic shape but a larger sinus diameter. Type 2 leaflet morphology is associated with ascending aorta dilatation , larger arch dimensions and higher prevalence of myxomatous mitral valve disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schaefer et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Bicuspid aortic valve (n=191). Type 1 BAV morphology vs. Type 2 BAV morphology was evaluated on Normal aortic shape (p=<0.01). Type 1 BAV is associated with normal aortic shape (60% vs 32%), whereas Type 2 is associated with ascending aorta dilatation (54% vs 35%) and myxomatous mitral valves (13% vs 2.6%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20b83bdaf9cf4b4eeb840fhttps://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.132092
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper