Key result
Multidisciplinary evaluation distinguishes physiological sinus tachycardia from inappropriate sinus tachycardia and POTS.
Why the study?
Classifying sinus tachycardia, considering possible etiologies, and determining optimal management remain difficult across overlapping medical specialties.
Understanding the classification, pathophysiological mechanisms, and appropriate autonomic testing for sinus tachycardia can help clinicians distinguish between normal physiological variants and distinct pathological syndromes.
May support multidisciplinary sinus tachycardia evaluation to distinguish variants from IST/POTS; leaves open prospective validation of diagnostic algorithms.
Sinus tachycardia (ST) is ubiquitous, but its presence outside of normal physiological triggers in otherwise healthy individuals remains a commonly encountered phenomenon in medical practice. In many cases, ST can be readily explained by a current medical condition that precipitates an increase in the sinus rate, but ST at rest without physiological triggers may also represent a spectrum of normal. In other cases, ST may not have an easily explainable cause but may represent serious underlying pathology and can be associated with intolerable symptoms. The classification of ST, consideration of possible etiologies, as well as the decisions of when and how to intervene can be difficult. ST can be classified as secondary to a specific, usually treatable, medical condition (eg, pulmonary embolism, anemia, infection, or hyperthyroidism) or be related to several incompletely defined conditions (eg, inappropriate ST, postural tachycardia syndrome, mast cell disorder, or post-COVID syndrome). While cardiologists and cardiac electrophysiologists often evaluate patients with symptoms associated with persistent or paroxysmal ST, an optimal approach remains uncertain. Due to the many possible conditions associated with ST, and an overlap in medical specialists who see these patients, the inclusion of experts in different fields is essential for a more comprehensive understanding. This article is unique in that it was composed by international experts in Neurology, Psychology, Autonomic Medicine, Allergy and Immunology, Exercise Physiology, Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Endocrinology, Cardiology, and Cardiac Electrophysiology in the hope that it will facilitate a more complete understanding and thereby result in the better care of patients with ST.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayuga et al. (2022) conducted a review in Sinus Tachycardia. Sinus Tachycardia was evaluated. Sinus tachycardia evaluation requires a multidisciplinary approach to differentiate physiological variants from pathological conditions like inappropriate sinus tachycardia and POTS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: