Key result
Caucasian race predicted worse heart failure self-care management (β = -11.188; p=0.006), while male gender predicted higher self-care confidence (β = 7.592; p=0.010).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to explore gender and racial differences in heart failure self-care processes and examine whether gender and race predict heart failure self-care.
Do gender and race predict heart failure self-care maintenance, management, and confidence in patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=107)
Do gender and race predict heart failure self-care maintenance, management, and confidence in patients with heart failure?
Effect estimate: β = -11.188 (management); β = 7.592 (confidence)
p-value: p = 0.006; p = 0.010
In patients with heart failure, non-Caucasian race is associated with better self-care management, and male gender is associated with higher self-care confidence.
Race/gender differences in HF self-care may inform tailored education; leaves open causal links and outcome impact in prospective studies.
Objectives To explore gender and racial differences in heart failure (HF) self-care processes and examine whether gender and race predict HF self-care. Methods A secondary analysis of baseline data ( n = 107) from a longitudinal HF study (54.2% males; 56% non-Caucasians) was conducted. The self-care of heart failure index was used to measure self-care maintenance, management, and confidence. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses examined gender and racial differences in HF self-care outcomes. Multiple linear regression examined whether gender and race predicted HF self-care maintenance, management, and confidence. Results Univariate analyses indicated that Caucasians reported significantly better self-care maintenance ( p = 0.042), while non-Caucasians reported significantly better self-care management ( p = 0.003). Males had significantly higher self-care confidence scores versus women ( p = 0.017). Multiple regression analysis indicated Caucasian race predicted significantly worse self-care management (β = −11.188; p = 0.006) versus non-Caucasian, while male gender predicted significantly higher self-care confidence scores (β = 7.592; p = 0.010) versus female gender. Gender nor race significantly predicted self-care maintenance. Discussion Although gender and race may influence HF self-care, other factors may be more important. More research is needed to identify individual factors that contribute to HF self-care to improve education and intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graven et al. (2019) conducted an observational in heart failure (n=107). Male gender and Caucasian race vs. Female gender and non-Caucasian race was evaluated on Heart failure self-care maintenance, management, and confidence (β = -11.188 (management); β = 7.592 (confidence), p=p = 0.006; p = 0.010). Caucasian race predicted worse heart failure self-care management (β = -11.188; p=0.006), while male gender predicted higher self-care confidence (β = 7.592; p=0.010).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: