Key result
Conventional glass badges correlate strongly with lens dosimeters for physician eye radiation during catheter ablation.
Why the study?
RFCA requires long fluoroscopy times that increase radiation dose to physicians eyes, and it was unknown whether conventional glass badges could serve as an alternative to recommended lens-specific dosimeters.
Does a conventional neck glass badge accurately estimate the radiation dose to the eye lens compared to a dedicated lens dosimeter in physicians performing radio frequency catheter ablation?
Observational (n=126)
No
Does a conventional neck glass badge accurately estimate the radiation dose to the eye lens compared to a dedicated lens dosimeter in physicians performing radio frequency catheter ablation?
Conventional neck glass badges may serve as a viable alternative to dedicated lens dosimeters for estimating physician eye radiation exposure during RFCA when using low-pulse fluoroscopy and ceiling shields.
BACKGROUND: Radio frequency catheter ablation (RFCA), a treatment for arrhythmia, requires a long fluoroscopy time that increases the radiation exposure dose to the physician, particularly to the lens of the eye. It is recommended that a lens-specific dosimeter such as DOSIRIS® is used to measure the dose to the lens. AIMS: In this study, we investigated whether conventional glass badges can be used as an alternative to lens dosimeters. METHODS: The doses to the lenses of two physicians (physician A, main operator; physician B, assistant; physician B was further away from the patient than physician A) were measured for 126 RFCA procedures performed over a 6-month period (fluoroscopy rate of 3.0 p/s with use of a ceiling-hanging shield). RESULTS: The cumulative value measured by a lens dosimeter attached to the inside of Pb glasses (0.07-mm dose equivalent) next to the left eye was 4.7 mSv for physician A, and 0.8 mSv for physician B. The reading on the glass badge worn on the left side of the neck was 4.7 mSv for physician A and 1.3 mSv for physician B. Lens dosimeter and glass badge values showed a good correlation for the left eye and left neck (r = 0.86, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We show that glass badges may be a viable alternative to lens-equivalent dosimetry when using low-pulse fluoroscopy and a ceiling-hanging shield.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morishima et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Occupational radiation exposure during radio frequency catheter ablation (n=126). Glass badge dosimeter vs. DOSIRIS lens dosimeter was evaluated on Correlation between lens dosimeter and glass badge radiation dose values (r = 0.86, p=<0.01). Conventional glass badges showed a strong correlation with lens-specific dosimeters (r = 0.86, p < 0.01) for measuring physician eye radiation dose during radio frequency catheter ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: