Key result
Catheter ablation resulted in a patient effective radiation dose of 15.2 mSv compared to 3.2 mSv for diagnostic studies, with very low estimated fatal cancer risks for both patients and staff.
Why the study?
What is the radiation exposure and associated risk for patients and staff during cardiac electrophysiology studies and catheter ablation procedures?
Observational (n=43)
What is the radiation exposure and associated risk for patients and staff during cardiac electrophysiology studies and catheter ablation procedures?
Absolute Event Rate: 15.2% vs 3.2%
Electrophysiology studies and radiofrequency ablation are safe regarding radiation exposure for both patients and personnel when performed with modern equipment and standard safety precautions.
Supports low radiation risks in ablation with modern equipment; leaves open prospective validation of long-term staff and patient outcomes.
AIMS: To perform a comprehensive analysis of all aspects of patient and in-room personnel radiation dosimetry in interventional electrophysiology. METHODS AND RESULTS: Measurements were performed during 19 diagnostic electrophysiology studies and 24 catheter ablations. Kerma-area product and exposure time values were 48.7 (6.4-230) Gy cm2 and 25.5 (4.4-79.2) min for ablation, and 12.5 (4.5-117.2) Gy cm2 and 4.5 (1.2-31) min for diagnostic studies, respectively. Patient effective doses were 15.2 (2.1-59.6) mSv for ablation and 3.2 (1.3-23.9) mSv for diagnostic procedures. Radiation risk to the patient was estimated to be up to eight cases of fatal cancer in 10,000 procedures. The risk of development of fatal cancer was less than 3x10(-6) per procedure to the primary operator. The risk for the nurse and technician was much lower. The dose per procedure for the primary operator was 7.1 microGy at the eyes, 0.79 microGy at the chest under the lead apron, 13.68 microGy at the chest over the apron, 3.82 microGy at the thyroid, 17.76 microGy at the left hand, and 12.11 microGy at the left knee. CONCLUSION: As far as radiation exposure is concerned, electrophysiology studies followed by radiofrequency ablation are safe procedures for both patient and personnel when performed in catheterization laboratories with modern equipment, experienced operators, and standard safety precautions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Efstathopoulos et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Interventional electrophysiology (n=43). Catheter ablation vs. Diagnostic electrophysiology studies was evaluated on Patient effective dose (mSv). Catheter ablation resulted in a patient effective radiation dose of 15.2 mSv compared to 3.2 mSv for diagnostic studies, with very low estimated fatal cancer risks for both patients and staff.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: