Key result
Radiation exposure was comparatively small, allowing thousands of procedures annually within occupational limits.
Why the study?
What is the radiation exposure to operators and patients during cardiac electrophysiology and device implantation procedures?
Observational (n=60)
What is the radiation exposure to operators and patients during cardiac electrophysiology and device implantation procedures?
Radiation exposure to operators and patients during EP studies, RF ablation, and device implantation is relatively small and safe when using modern equipment and protective gear.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low exposure supports high-volume EP practice; leaves open prospective confirmation of safety.
The purpose of this study was to measure the radiation exposure to operator and patient during cardiac electrophysiology study, radiofrequency catheter ablation and cardiac device implantation procedures and to calculate the allowable number of cases per year. We carried out 9 electrophysiology studies, 40 radiofrequency catheter ablation and 11 cardiac device implantation procedures. To measure occupational radiation dose and dose–area product (DAP), 13 photoluminescence glass dosimeters were placed at eyes (inside and outside lead glass), thyroids (inside and outside thyroid collar), chest (inside and outside lead apron), wrists, genital of the operator (inside lead apron), and 6 of photoluminescence glass dosimeters were placed at eyes, thyroids, chest and genital of the patient. Exposure time and DAP values were 11.7 ± 11.8 min and 23.2 ± 26.2 Gy cm2 for electrophysiology study; 36.5 ± 42.1 min and 822.4 ± 125.5 Gy cm2 for radiofrequency catheter ablation; 16.2 ± 9.3 min and 27.8 ± 16.5 Gy cm2 for cardiac device implantation procedure, prospectively. 4591 electrophysiology studies can be conducted within the occupational exposure limit for the eyes (150 mSv), and 658-electrophysiology studies with radiofrequency catheter ablation can be carried out within the occupational exposure limit for the hands (500 mSv). 1654 cardiac device implantation procedure can be conducted within the occupational exposure limit for the eyes (150 mSv). The amounts of the operator and patient's radiation exposure were comparatively small. So, electrophysiology study, radio frequency catheter ablation and cardiac device implantation procedures are safe when performed with modern equipment and optimized protective radiation protect equipment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Cardiac arrhythmias or device indications (n=60). Cardiac electrophysiology study, radiofrequency catheter ablation, and cardiac device implantation was evaluated on Occupational radiation dose and dose-area product (DAP). Radiation exposure was comparatively small, allowing thousands of procedures annually within occupational limits.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: