Key result
EP and device procedures generate low occupational radiation, yielding ~1 mSv under-apron dose over two years.
Why the study?
Real-world data on operator radiation exposure during electrophysiological procedures and device implantations are lacking, alongside an absence of well-established diagnostic reference levels.
What is the real-world occupational radiation exposure during contemporary cardiac electrophysiology and device therapy procedures, and does it exceed recommended dose limits for pregnant operators?
Observational (n=838)
No
What is the real-world occupational radiation exposure during contemporary cardiac electrophysiology and device therapy procedures, and does it exceed recommended dose limits for pregnant operators?
Occupational radiation exposure during contemporary electrophysiological procedures and device implantations is lower than pre-existing diagnostic reference levels and remains far below recommended dose limits, including for pregnant professionals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports low exposure for pregnant EP operators; leaves open validation in prospective cohorts before guideline updates.
Introduction Despite considerable reductions in radiation doses achieved through modern equipment and technologies, including 3D mapping systems in invasive electrophysiology, concerns about occupational radiation exposure during cardiac procedures persist, especially among female physicians. International recommended dose limits include 1 mSv per year for the general population, 20 mSv per year for occupationally exposed persons and 1 mSv on the uterus during an entire pregnancy. However, there is a lack of real-world data on operator exposure during electrophysiological procedures and device implantations, and a lack of well-established diagnostic reference levels. To address these gaps, we conducted a two-year prospective analysis assessing radiation doses in a modern catheterization laboratory including personal dosimetry above and underneath the radiation protection apron. Methods All procedures performed in the catheterization laboratory of our Center over 24 months (August 2023-2025) were conducted using two continuously active electronic personal dosimeters measuring Hp(10), which was used as a conservative surrogate of organ dose, throughout the procedure (EPD TruDose, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The primary operator wore one EPD above and one underneath the lead apron at the level of the lower abdomen. In between procedures, the EPDs were continuously kept turned-on in the control room. Radiation doses before and after each procedure, dose–area products (DAPs) and fluoroscopy times were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Results A total of 838 procedures were assessed (613 catheter ablations and 225 device implantations). Radiation doses varied significantly between different procedures. The overall median DAP was 143(0-2535) cGycm² for catheter ablations and 162 (0-6195) cGycm² for device implantations (p<0.001). The highest radiation doses were assessed during CRT implantations and pulmonary vein isolations using the cryo balloon (612 (154-2673) and 454 (151-2535) cGycm², respectively). The median personal radiation dose per procedure documented by the EPD underneath the lead apron was 0 mSv (0-0.001) for catheter ablations and 0.001 mSv (0-0.012) for device implantations (p<0.001). The median personal radiation dose per procedure documented by the EPD above the lead apron was 0.001 mSv (0-0.09) for catheter ablations and 0.08 mSv (0-0.102) for device implantations (p<0.001). Over the entire two-year study period, the cumulative radiation doses on the EDPs worn above and underneath the lead apron were 4.471 mSv and 0.924 mSv, respectively. Conclusion In a modern catheterization laboratory, occupational radiation exposure during cardiac electrophysiological procedures and device implantations varies between procedures and is lower than pre-existing diagnostic reference levels suggest. It remains far below recommended dose limits including for pregnant professionals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mueller-Leisse et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiac electrophysiological procedures and device implantations (n=838). Cardiac electrophysiological procedures and device implantations was evaluated on Radiation doses (dose-area products and personal dosimetry) (p=<0.001). Occupational radiation exposure during cardiac electrophysiology and device therapy was low, with cumulative doses over two years of 4.471 mSv above and 0.924 mSv underneath the lead apron.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: