Why the study?
What is the frequency and histologic morphology of atherosclerotic aortic debris dislodged by coronary catheters in patients undergoing cardiac procedures?
Observational (n=7,621)
What is the frequency and histologic morphology of atherosclerotic aortic debris dislodged by coronary catheters in patients undergoing cardiac procedures?
Macroscopically visible atheromatous debris is dislodged in 0.54% of cardiac catheterizations, predominantly with large-lumen (8 Fr) guiding catheters, highlighting the need for smaller catheters and sufficient free backflow to avoid embolization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports caution with 8 Fr catheters to limit debris; leaves open prospective validation of embolization risk.
Embolic events during cardiac catheterization have been attributed to atherosclerotic aortic debris dislodged by catheter manipulation. We evaluated the frequency and the histologic morphology of atherothrombotic material retrieved during placement of coronary catheters in patients undergoing diagnostic or interventional cardiac procedures. Over a 4-year period, macroscopically visible aortic debris from coronary catheters, if present after advancement to the ascending aorta, was obtained for histologic examination. In 41 of 7,621 patients (0.54%), visible atherothrombotic material was present in the backflow of catheters. Debris occurred most frequently with 8 Fr guiding catheters (98%). Histologic examination showed foam cells, cholesterol crystals, and amorphic lipoid substance as markers of atheromatous material from atherosclerotic plaques in 38/41 patients (93%) with former plaque hemorrhage in 55% of them. In three patients, fresh thrombus material was observed (7%). None of these patients showed in-hospital ischemic complications. Although visible atheromatous material is a rare phenomenon in cardiac catheterization, an increased risk of scraping debris is associated with large-lumen guiding catheters. In order to avoid vascular embolization, the use of smaller guiding catheters and sufficient free backflow of catheters after advancement are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eggebrecht et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Diagnostic or interventional cardiac procedures (n=7,621). Placement of coronary catheters was evaluated on Frequency of visible atherothrombotic material in the backflow of catheters.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: