Key result
An anti-FXa chromogenic assay demonstrated good accuracy in estimating edoxaban concentrations relative to LC/MS/MS (GLSM ratio 114.3% for 60mg, P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does an automated anti-FXa chromogenic assay accurately estimate edoxaban concentrations compared to LC/MS/MS in healthy volunteers receiving edoxaban?
RCT (n=30)
Open-label
randomized
Does an automated anti-FXa chromogenic assay accurately estimate edoxaban concentrations compared to LC/MS/MS in healthy volunteers receiving edoxaban?
Effect estimate: GLSM ratio 114.3% (95% CI 108.2-120.8)
p-value: p=<0.0001
An anti-FXa chromogenic assay with edoxaban-specific calibrators accurately estimates edoxaban plasma concentrations relative to the gold-standard LC/MS/MS method.
Facilitates routine edoxaban monitoring without LC/MS/MS; confirms assay accuracy in healthy volunteers.
INTRODUCTION: This phase I, open-label, multiple-dose, two-treatment study assessed the relationship between edoxaban equivalent concentration derived from an anti-FXa assay with the summed concentration of edoxaban and its active metabolite, M-4, as assessed by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). This study also assessed the relationship between edoxaban plasma concentrations assessed by LC/MS/MS in sodium citrate and lithium heparin tubes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Healthy volunteers were randomized to receive once-daily edoxaban 60mg or 90mg for 5days (15 participants per treatment group). Serial blood samples were collected for analysis by LC/MS/MS and by the anti-FXa assay. Edoxaban equivalent levels were assessed using a commercially available anti-FXa activity assay with an edoxaban-specific setup. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The day 5 concentration estimates were significantly correlated between the 2 assays (P<0.0001 for both edoxaban doses). The geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratio (90% confidence interval) for edoxaban equivalent concentrations vs edoxaban + M-4 concentrations was 114.3% (108.2-120.8) for edoxaban 60mg (P<0.0001) and 113.0% (107.1-119.2) for edoxaban 90mg (P=0.0002). The GLSM ratio for edoxaban concentrations in sodium citrate vs lithium heparin tubes for 60-mg and 90-mg edoxaban doses were 82.8% (78.5-87.3) and 83.9% (79.1-89.0), respectively. In this study, an anti-FXa chromogenic assay with edoxaban-specific calibrators and controls demonstrated good accuracy in estimating edoxaban concentrations across a wide range of concentrations relative to LC/MS/MS at steady state following the administration of once-daily edoxaban for 5days.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=30). Edoxaban was evaluated on Relationship between edoxaban equivalent concentration derived from an anti-FXa assay and summed concentration of edoxaban and M-4 by LC/MS/MS (GLSM ratio 114.3%, 95% CI 108.2-120.8, p=<0.0001). An anti-FXa chromogenic assay demonstrated good accuracy in estimating edoxaban concentrations relative to LC/MS/MS (GLSM ratio 114.3% for 60mg, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: