Key result
Oscillometric blood pressure measurement showed good agreement with intra-arterial monitoring for mean arterial pressure in infants with aortic coarctation (mean difference -3.235 mmHg).
Why the study?
Does oscillometric blood pressure measurement agree with intra-arterial measurement in the lower extremities of infants undergoing aortic coarctation repair?
Observational (n=40)
Does oscillometric blood pressure measurement agree with intra-arterial measurement in the lower extremities of infants undergoing aortic coarctation repair?
Mean Difference: -3.235 (95% CI -18.842–12.372)
Oscillometric blood pressure measurement shows good agreement with invasive femoral artery measurement in infants with aortic coarctation, with mean arterial pressure providing the most accurate results.
May support oscillometric MAP use in coarctation infants; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Anesthetic management for patients undergoing surgical repair of aortic coarctation (CoA) should include constant blood pressure monitoring of the right upper extremity and a lower extremity. The delayed or absent pulse in the lower limbs often leads to unsuccessful arterial cannulation in infants and the oscillometric technique used for blood pressure measurement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between the oscillometric method and intra-arterial technique for blood pressure monitoring in the lower limbs of infants undergoing CoA. METHODS: A total of 45 infants diagnosed with isolated CoA were initially enrolled in this study and five were excluded because of cannulation failure. Thus, 40 patients had their blood pressure measured simultaneously by both oscillometric technique on the thigh and femoral artery catheterization. After induction and intubation, five pairs of blood pressure readings from each patient were collected in an interval of 3 min. Statistical analysis was accomplished by revised Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurements [systolic blood pressure (SBP) r = 0.771, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) r = 0.704 and mean artery pressure (MAP) r = 0.850]. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (95% LOA) between oscillometric and femoral artery blood pressure readings was 3.830 mmHg (-19.297, 26.957) for SBP, -8.725 mmHg (-26.236, 8.786) for DBP, and -3.235 mmHg (-18.842, 12.372) for MAP. There were only one pair of MAP (1/40) and two pairs of SBP readings (2/40) out of range (95% LOA), and all of paired DBP readings were within 95% LOA. CONCLUSION: There was a good agreement between oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurements of lower extremities in infants with isolated CoA statistically. However, the oscillometry-measured SBP showed a tendency to overestimate the intra-arterial blood pressure reference, while oscillometry-measured DBP underestimated its reference. MAP measurement provided the most accurate and reliable results in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Isolated aortic coarctation (CoA) (n=40). Oscillometric blood pressure measurement on the thigh vs. Intra-arterial technique (femoral artery catheterization) was evaluated on Agreement between oscillometric and femoral artery blood pressure readings for mean arterial pressure (MAP) (MD -3.235 mmHg, 95% CI -18.842 to 12.372). Oscillometric blood pressure measurement showed good agreement with intra-arterial monitoring for mean arterial pressure in infants with aortic coarctation (mean difference -3.235 mmHg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: