Key result
Tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging offer promise for the accurate and reproducible quantification of regional myocardial function compared to conventional wall motion assessment.
Why the study?
Do tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging improve the accuracy of diagnosing coronary artery disease compared to conventional wall motion assessment during stress echocardiography?
Do tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging improve the accuracy of diagnosing coronary artery disease compared to conventional wall motion assessment during stress echocardiography?
Tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging offer promising quantitative approaches to improve the accuracy of stress echocardiography for diagnosing coronary artery disease.
May improve CAD detection on stress echocardiography; leaves open need for prospective validation before adoption.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review highlights recent progress in the quantitative approach to the interpretation of stress echocardiograms. Recent literature regarding the application of tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease is summarized. RECENT FINDINGS: The high temporal and spatial resolution of tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging permit recognition of regional myocardial dysfunction. These techniques have been performed during low- and high-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography and have been applied to exercise echocardiography. During stress, the peak systolic velocity and early diastolic velocity increased to a greater degree in normal segments compared to ischemic segments. With tissue Doppler imaging, viable segments show increases in systolic velocities in contrast to infarcted segments. Presently, the feasibility of strain rate imaging is slightly less than that of conventional wall motion assessment. However, in preliminary studies, tissue Doppler parameters and especially strain rate parameters appear to offer advantages in accuracy compared to conventional wall motion assessment. SUMMARY: Tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging offer great promise for the accurate, reproducible quantification of regional myocardial function. Further studies are indicated to prove their accuracy, efficiency, and superiority over existing methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patricia A. Pellikka (2005) conducted a review in coronary artery disease. Tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging vs. conventional wall motion assessment was evaluated. Tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging offer promise for the accurate and reproducible quantification of regional myocardial function compared to conventional wall motion assessment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: