Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors describe an innovative perspective for the evaluation of professional development programming in science. This perspective focused on a self-critical analysis of the reflective practices developed and used among program participants. This approach ties program quality directly to issues impacting the implementation of curriculum reform in the science classroom. An illustrative case of this innovation in action is presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Templin et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: