Key result
A review of aortic root surgeries, including valve-sparing procedures, the Ross procedure, and the Russian conduit, was conducted to determine competitive advantages and develop a surgical algorithm.
Why the study?
The Bentall procedure has drawbacks, and various valve-sparing and valve-replacing surgeries each have their own advantages and disadvantages.
What are the competitive advantages of various surgical procedures for aortic root pathology to develop a surgical algorithm?
What are the competitive advantages of various surgical procedures for aortic root pathology to develop a surgical algorithm?
This review provides a comparative analysis of various aortic root surgeries to aid in developing a surgical algorithm for choosing the optimal correction method.
Today, the Bentall procedure is the most common procedure for aortic root pathology, but it is not without drawbacks. Modern aortic root surgery pursues the following purposes: radicality, continuation of life and quality of life improvement. Various valve-sparing procedures, as well as valve-replacing surgeries have own advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this review was to determine competitive advantages of each procedure on the aortic root and develop surgical algorithm. We analyzed aortic root surgeries devoid of prosthesis-induced drawbacks. Ross procedure and «Russian conduit» were also considered in case of severe valve dysnfucntion or structural lesion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Комаров et al. (2023) conducted a review in Aortic root pathology. Valve-sparing procedures, Ross procedure, and Russian conduit vs. Bentall procedure was evaluated. A review of aortic root surgeries, including valve-sparing procedures, the Ross procedure, and the Russian conduit, was conducted to determine competitive advantages and develop a surgical algorithm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: