Key result
Total aortic root reconstruction shows similar survival and mortality compared to partial root reconstruction.
Why the study?
Anatomical variations in aortic root pathology require various surgical reconstructions, but their influence on morbidity and mortality needed examination.
Does total versus partial aortic root reconstruction affect survival and complication rates in patients with aortic root pathology?
Cohort (n=53)
Does total versus partial aortic root reconstruction affect survival and complication rates in patients with aortic root pathology?
A selective approach to aortic root reconstruction, tailoring the extent of repair to the pathology, yields excellent survival and comparable outcomes between total and partial reconstructions.
Does not support altering surgical approach by root extent; leaves open need for prospective trials to guide aortic reconstruction.
Anatomical variations in aortic root pathology, including combinations of dissection, aneurysmal dilatation, annuloaortic ectasia, and valve disease, defy standardized repair and mandate application of various surgical reconstructions. To examine these techniques, and their influence on morbidity and mortality, we reviewed 53 consecutive patients undergoing aortic root procedures. Thirty-two patients underwent total root reconstruction. Of these, 21 underwent Bentall procedures, 9 had a modification thereof, and 2 underwent a Cabrol reconstruction. Less extensive pathology was corrected in 21 patients with a partial root reconstruction. These included aortic valve replacement (AVR) and a separate tube graft in 14 patients, AVR and primary aortic repair +/- wrapping in 4 individuals, and AVR and patch aortic root enlargement in 3 patients. Mean age was 53.2 years (range 20 to 79). Nearly 20% had undergone previous cardiac surgery and 7.5% were emergencies. Early mortality was 4%. Complications included dysrhythmias (48%), myocardial infarction (4%), stroke (4%), pneumonia (14%), and pancreatitis (2%). There were no reoperations for bleeding. Three late complications, one pseudoaneurysm and two perivalvular leaks, were successfully repaired. Late deaths (13.7%) were caused by congestive heart failure (3), myocardial infarction (MI) (1), cancer (1), stroke (1), and accidental fall (1). Kaplan-Meier analysis reveals 1-, 5-, and 10-year survivals of 98%, 81%, and 66%. Survival and mortality data did not differ between groups, and except for the incidence of atrial dysrhythmias, complication rates also were not significantly different. This series illustrates the need for and the successful application of a selective approach to aortic root reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (1994) conducted a cohort in Aortic root pathology (n=53). Total root reconstruction vs. Partial root reconstruction was evaluated on Survival and mortality. Total aortic root reconstruction showed similar survival and mortality compared to partial root reconstruction, with an overall 10-year survival of 66%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: