Key result
This paper is a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating a pharmacogenetic-based warfarin dosing algorithm compared to traditional anticoagulation, and contains no clinical results.
Why the study?
Does a pharmacogenetic-based warfarin dosing algorithm improve the time to achieve the therapeutic target and time in therapeutic range in patients with atrial fibrillation and historically low TTR (<50%)?
RCT (n=300)
Single-blind
Computer-generated randomization
No
Does a pharmacogenetic-based warfarin dosing algorithm improve the time to achieve the therapeutic target and time in therapeutic range in patients with atrial fibrillation and historically low TTR (<50%)?
This study protocol outlines a randomized trial to evaluate whether a population-specific pharmacogenetic algorithm improves anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation patients with historically poor time in therapeutic range.
Results awaited from this RCT; leaves open whether pharmacogenetic dosing improves TTR in low-control AF.
BACKGROUND: Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is a measurement of quality of warfarin therapy and lower TTR values (<50%) are associated with greater risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events. Recently, we developed a pharmacogenetic-based warfarin dosing algorithm specifically calibrated for a Brazilian patient sample. The aims of this study are: to evaluate the impact of a genetic-based algorithm, compared to traditional anticoagulation, in the time to achieve the therapeutic target and in TTR percentage; and to assess the cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided warfarin dosing in a specific cohort of patients with low TTR (<50%) from a tertiary cardiovascular hospital. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a randomized controlled trial in patients (n = 300) with atrial fibrillation with TTR < 50%, based on the last three INR values. At the first consultation, patients will be randomized into two groups: TA group (traditional anticoagulation) and PA group (pharmacogenetic anticoagulation). For the first group, the physician will adjust the dose according to current INR value and, for the second group, a pharmacogenetic algorithm will be used. At the second, third, fourth and fifth consultations (with an interval of 7 days each) INR will be measured and, if necessary, the dose will be adjusted based on guidelines. Afterwards, patients who are INR stable will begin measuring their INR in 30 day intervals; if the patient's INR is not stable, the patient will return in 7 days for a new measurement of the INR. Outcomes measures will include the time to achieve the therapeutic target and the percentage of TTR at 4 and 12 weeks. In addition, as a secondary end-point, pharmacoeconomic analysis will be carried out. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee for Medical Research on Human Beings of the Clinical Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School. DISCUSSION: This randomized study will include patients with low TTR and it will evaluate whether a population-specific genetic algorithm might be more effective than traditional anticoagulation for a selected group of poorly anticoagulated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02592980 . Registered on 29 October 2015.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcatto et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation with low time in therapeutic range (n=300). Pharmacogenetic-based warfarin dosing algorithm vs. Traditional anticoagulation (guideline-based dosing) was evaluated on Time to achieve the therapeutic target (three INR values within the therapeutic target). This paper is a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating a pharmacogenetic-based warfarin dosing algorithm compared to traditional anticoagulation, and contains no clinical results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: