Why the study?
Warfarin has a narrow therapeutic window, and time in therapeutic range is an important anticoagulation quality metric influenced by several factors that require identification.
Do specific genetic, demographic, and clinical factors influence time in therapeutic range in patients using warfarin?
Do specific genetic, demographic, and clinical factors influence time in therapeutic range in patients using warfarin?
Specific genetic factors (CYP2C9 alleles) and co-medications significantly influence warfarin time in therapeutic range, highlighting the potential utility of genetic testing and personalized monitoring.
Warfarin is an oral anticoagulant prescribed to prevent and treat thromboembolic disorders. It has a narrow therapeutic window and must have its effect controlled. Prothrombin test, expressed in INR value, is used for dose management. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) is an important outcome of quality control of anticoagulation therapy and is influenced by several factors. The aim of this study was to identify genetic, demographic, and clinical factors that can potentially influence TTR. In total,422 patients using warfarin were investigated. Glibenclamide co-medication and presence of CYP2C9*2 and/or *3 alleles were associated with higher TTR, while amiodarone, acetaminophen and verapamil co-medication were associated with lower TTR. Our data suggest that TTR is influenced by co-medication and genetic factors. Thus, individuals in use of glibenclamide may need a more careful monitoring and genetic testing (CYP2C9*2 and/or *3 alleles) may improve the anticoagulation management. In addition, in order to reach and maintain the INR in the target for a longer period, it is better to discuss dose adjustment in office instead of by telephone assessment. Other studies are needed to confirm these results and to find more variables that could contribute to this important parameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Botton et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: