Key result
Adherence to screening guidelines for diabetic retinopathy is low, with >50% of patients with diabetes failing to receive necessary screening due to various socioeconomic and demographic risk factors.
More than half of diabetic patients in the US fail to receive necessary diabetic retinopathy screening, highlighting the need for interventions addressing socioeconomic and demographic disparities.
Underserved diabetic patients risk undetected retinopathy progression; leaves open optimal equity-focused interventions for prospective evaluation.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of new-onset blindness in American adults aged 20-74 years old. The number of diabetics living with diagnosed DR increased by 89%, from 4.06 million to 7.69 million, between 2000 and 2010. Projected numbers from the Vision Health Initiative by the CDC predict that the rate of DR will triple by 2050, from 5.5 million people living with DR to 16 million. Screening guidelines aim to detect cases early because the treatments for DR can reduce severe vision loss by up to 94%. However, adherence to these guidelines is quite low. It is estimated that more than half of patients with diabetes may fail to receive necessary screening. Risk factors for non-screening discussed in this study include low health literacy, lack of access to care, pregnancy, physician adherence to guidelines, unique factors present in different minority populations, gender and age disparities, and living in rural regions. This paper also aims to address potential interventions that may improve adherence rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fathy et al. (2016) conducted a review in Diabetic retinopathy. Adherence to screening guidelines was evaluated. Adherence to screening guidelines for diabetic retinopathy is low, with >50% of patients with diabetes failing to receive necessary screening due to various socioeconomic and demographic risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: