Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A simple approach for correcting for the effect of vegetation in the estimation of the surface soil moisture ( w S ) from L-band passive microwave observations is presented in this study. The approach is based on semi-empirical relationships between soil moisture and the polarized reflectivity including the effect of the vegetation optical depth which is parameterized as a function of the normalized vegetation difference index (NDVI). The method was tested against in situ measurements collected over a grass site from 2004 to 2007 (SMOSREX experiment). Two polarizations (horizontal/vertical) and five incidence angles (20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, and 60°) were considered in the analysis. The best w S estimations were obtained when using both polarizations at an angle of 40°. The average accuracy in the soil moisture retrievals was found to be approximately 0.06 m3/m3, improving the estimations by 0.02 m3/m3 with respect to the case in which the vegetation effect is not considered. The results indicate that information on vegetation (through a vegetation index such as NDVI) is useful for the estimation of soil moisture through the semi-empirical regressions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mattar et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: