Key result
Controlled diabetes with HbA1c < 7.0% did not significantly increase the long-term risk of MACE compared to normal HbA1c < 5.7% after percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.62-1.34, p=0.630).
Why the study?
Whether prediabetic and controlled diabetic levels of HbA1c are associated with increased MACE after PCI remains unclear.
Does controlled diabetes (HbA1c < 7.0%) compared to non-diabetes with varying HbA1c levels affect the risk of MACE in patients undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=3,337)
Yes
Does controlled diabetes (HbA1c < 7.0%) compared to non-diabetes with varying HbA1c levels affect the risk of MACE in patients undergoing PCI?
Diabetic patients undergoing PCI who achieve controlled HbA1c (<7.0%) have a similar long-term prognosis regarding MACE and cardiac death as non-diabetic patients.
Controlled diabetes (HbA1c <7%) was associated with similar post-PCI MACE risk; leaves open optimal glycemic targets pending randomized evidence.
Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is an established marker associated with cardiovascular risk, even if it is below the diagnostic threshold for diabetes mellitus (DM). However, whether or not prediabetic and controlled diabetic levels of HbA1c are associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. This observational study included a total of 9128 patients who underwent PCI in the COACT registry from eight centers in Korea. A total of 2517 non-DM patients were divided into three groups (Groups I, II, III) according to their HbA1c levels and compared with 965 controlled DM patients (HbA1c < 7.0%, Group IV). During 22 months of median follow-up, there was no significant differences in MACE (p = 0.294) and cardiac death (p = 0.105) among the four groups. In addition, there were also no significant differences in MACE (p = 0.058) between Group III and Group IV. Although patients were diagnosed as DM, they had a similar prognosis in the same range of newly diagnosed DM patients in HbA1c, if they were treated well. The results of this study suggest that intensive treatment is required to reach the Hba1c target in diabetic patients with PCI in order to have a similar prognosis to patients not previously diagnosed with diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=3,337). Controlled diabetes (HbA1c < 7.0%) vs. Normal HbA1c (< 5.7%) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.62-1.34, p=0.630). Controlled diabetes with HbA1c < 7.0% did not significantly increase the long-term risk of MACE compared to normal HbA1c < 5.7% after percutaneous coronary intervention (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.62-1.34, p=0.630).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: