Why the study?
Does somatosensory stimulation alter wall shear rate in pial arterioles in anesthetized rats?
Does somatosensory stimulation alter wall shear rate in pial arterioles in anesthetized rats?
The findings suggest that a flow (shear stress)-mediated mechanism does not play an important role in the dilator response of pial arterioles to sciatic nerve stimulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Animal findings indicate shear-independent pial dilation; leaves open mechanisms of somatosensory neurovascular coupling for translational study.
We tested the hypothesis that a shear stress-dependent mechanism is involved in the dilation of pial arterioles during somatosensory stimulation. In alpha-chloralose-anesthetized rats implanted with cranial windows, we simultaneously measured the diameter and flow velocity of pial arterioles with video and dual-slit methods. Stimulation (0.2-0.3 V, 5 Hz, 0.5 ms pulses for 20 s) of the contralateral sciatic nerve evoked consistent dilator responses in pial arterioles (36 +/- 1 micron diam) without affecting blood pressure. The dilator responses consisted of an initial transient peak dilation of 30 +/- 3%, followed by a sustained dilation of 13 +/- 1% (n = 11). Mean velocity increased by 16.4 +/- 5.7% at 5 s after stimulus onset. Wall shear rate and volume flow were calculated from diameter and velocity data by assuming a parabolic flow profile. There was no significant change in wall shear rate, whereas flow rate increased significantly during sciatic nerve stimulation. The present findings suggest that a flow (shear stress)-mediated mechanism does not play an important role in the dilator response of pial arterioles to sciatic nerve stimulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ngai et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: