Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Railroads have long faced the problem of formulating an objective measure of track quality, termed a Track Quality Index (TQI). However, the industry has yet to formulate a standardized TQI. The Federal Railroad Administration has mandated track safety standards. These could be interpreted as the lower bound of track condition, with track design standards representing the upper bound. A Track Quality Index addresses the condition of track between these bounds. Since track geometry serves as the forcing function on a free rolling rail car, it is the logical basis for formulating a TQI. Another advantage of track geometry is its ability to be automatically measured and recorded at high speeds. Research has shown that track geometry can be represented as a periodically modulated random process. In good quality, i.e., high speed track, a significant percentage of the maintenance performed is directed towards the deterministic components. It is therefore essential to include these in a TQI for high speed track.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fazio et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: