Key result
The maximum deflection index has limited value for discriminating endocardial from epicardial ventricular arrhythmia origins, being reliable for AMC (100%) but less so for LCC (73%) and Epi (67%).
Why the study?
What are the electrocardiographic and electrophysiological features that discriminate idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias originating within or adjacent to the left sinus of Valsalva?
Observational (n=48)
What are the electrocardiographic and electrophysiological features that discriminate idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias originating within or adjacent to the left sinus of Valsalva?
The maximum deflection index has limited value for discriminating endocardial from epicardial origins of ventricular arrhythmias adjacent to the left sinus of Valsalva, likely due to preferential conduction or intramural origins.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MDI warrants caution for LCC/epicardial localization; leaves open need for refined ECG criteria in left sinus of Valsalva VA.
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) may be amenable to catheter ablation within or adjacent to the left sinus of Valsalva (LSOV). However, features that discriminate these sites have not been defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the electrocardiographic and electrophysiological features of VAs originating within or adjacent to the LSOV. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 48 consecutive patients undergoing successful catheter ablation of idiopathic VAs originating from the left coronary cusp (LCC, n = 29), aortomitral continuity (AMC, n = 10) and great cardiac vein or anterior interventricular cardiac vein (Epi, n = 9). A small r wave, or rarely an R wave, was typically observed in lead I during the VAs and pacing in these regions. An S wave in lead V5 or V6 occurred significantly more often during both the VAs and pacing from the AMC than during that from the LCC and Epi (p < 0.05 to 0.0001). For discriminating whether VA origins can be ablated endocardially or epicardially, the maximum deflection index (MDI = the shortest time to the maximum deflection in any precordial lead/QRS duration) was reliable for VAs arising from the AMC (100%), but was less reliable for LCC (73%) and Epi (67%) VAs. In 3 (33%) of the Epi VAs, the site of an excellent pace map was located transmurally opposite to the successful ablation site (LCC = 1 and AMC = 2). CONCLUSIONS: The MDI has limited value for discriminating endocardial from epicardial VA origins in sites adjacent to the LSOV probably due to preferential conduction, intramural VA origins or myocardium in contact with the LCC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamada et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (n=48). Electrocardiographic and electrophysiological features (including Maximum Deflection Index) was evaluated on Reliability of maximum deflection index (MDI) for discriminating endocardial from epicardial VA origins. The maximum deflection index has limited value for discriminating endocardial from epicardial ventricular arrhythmia origins, being reliable for AMC (100%) but less so for LCC (73%) and Epi (67%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: