Why the study?
Resting coronary blood flow approximates maximal vasodilation in very severe stenosis, prompting evaluation of the incidence, clinical characteristics, and long-term prognosis of exhausted vasodilatory reserve after FFR-guided PCI.
Does the presence of basal maximal vasodilation (exhausted vasodilatory reserve) affect long-term outcomes in patients undergoing FFR-guided PCI for severe coronary stenosis?
Cohort (n=151)
Does the presence of basal maximal vasodilation (exhausted vasodilatory reserve) affect long-term outcomes in patients undergoing FFR-guided PCI for severe coronary stenosis?
Patients with exhausted vasodilatory reserve (BMV) treated with FFR-guided PCI have similar long-term outcomes compared to those with intact vasodilatory reserve.
Exhausted vasodilatory reserve should not yet alter FFR-guided PCI decisions; leaves open its independent prognostic role in larger cohorts.
OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: Resting coronary blood flow approximates flow with maximal vasodilation in very severe coronary stenosis. We studied the incidence of exhausted vasodilatory reserve by FFR, its clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis after FFR guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing FFR-guided PCI for coronary stenosis with reduced resting blood flow (baseline Pd/Pa < 0.8) were included. Basal maximal vasodilation (BMV) was defined as less than 5% difference between resting Pd/Pa and FFR, that is, FFR-baseline Pd/Pa < 0.05. RESULTS: Of 658 vessels that underwent FFR-guided PCI in 602 patients, 151 vessels had resting blood flow in the ischemic range (baseline Pd/Pa ≤ 0.8) and were included in the analysis. Of these, 28 lesions in 28 patients met criteria for BMV (4.25% of the entire registry and 18.5% of those with the reduced basal coronary flow). Stenosis severity was a significant predictor of the presence of BMV. In long term follow-up (median 106 ± 3.6 months), BMV was not associated with increased target vessel revascularization (TVR) or major adverse cardiac event compared to non-BMV(OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.7-4.8, p-value 0.2 and OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.75-2.5, p = 0.3, respectively). CONCLUSION: Low baseline Pd/Pa that approximates fractional flow reserve (exhausted vasodilatory reserve) defines a subgroup of patients with severe coronary artery stenosis. Prognosis, when treated with PCI along with medical therapy, appears similar to those with intact vasodilatory reserve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vallurupalli et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary stenosis with reduced resting blood flow (n=151). Basal maximal vasodilation (BMV) vs. non-BMV was evaluated on Target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.7-4.8, p=0.2).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: