Key result
Computational modeling of the free energy landscape demonstrated that the Spudich model is more consistent with the 25-36 nm step size of myosin VI than the Houdusse-Sweeney model.
Why the study?
Two competing models have been proposed to explain the large and variable step size of myosin VI dimer, but their consistency with stepping motion observations has not been examined in detail.
Computational free energy landscape analysis supports the Spudich model over the Houdusse-Sweeney model for explaining the large step size of the Myosin VI motor protein.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Favors Spudich model for myosin VI stepping; leaves open validation in cardiac muscle mechanics.
Myosin VI dimer walks toward the minus end of the actin filament with a large and variable step size of 25–36 nm. Two competing models have been put forward to explain this large step size. The Spudich model assumes that the myosin VI dimer associates at a distal tail near the cargo-binding domain, which makes two full-length single α-helix (SAH) domains serve as long legs. In contrast, the Houdusse–Sweeney model assumes that the association occurs in the middle (between residues 913 and 940) of the SAH domain and that the three-helix bundles unfold to ensure the large step size. Their consistency with the observation of stepping motion with a large and variable step size has not been examined in detail. To compare the two proposed models of myosin VI, we computationally characterized the free energy landscape experienced by the leading head during the stepping movement along the actin filament using the elastic network model of two heads and an implicit model of the SAH domains. Our results showed that the Spudich model is more consistent with the 25–36 nm step size than the Houdusse–Sweeney model. The unfolding of the three-helix bundles gives rise to the free energy bias toward a shorter distance between two heads. Besides, the stiffness of the SAH domain is a key factor for giving strong energetic bias toward the longer distance of stepping. Free energy analysis of the stepping motion complements the visual inspection of static structures and enables a deeper understanding of underlying mechanisms of molecular motors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terada et al. (2022) studied Myosin VI stepping movement. Computational modeling of Myosin VI (Spudich vs Houdusse-Sweeney models) was evaluated on Consistency with 25-36 nm step size based on free energy landscape. Computational modeling of the free energy landscape demonstrated that the Spudich model is more consistent with the 25-36 nm step size of myosin VI than the Houdusse-Sweeney model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: