Study assessed maxillary sinus morphometry to classify biological sex in adults, indicating potential forensic applications.
The maxillary sinus exhibits sexual variation that is useful for forensic identification. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) enables precise quantification of linear and volumetric dimensions; however, evidence regarding the most discriminative parameter remains heterogeneous. This study aimed to determine whether CBCT-derived morphometry of the maxillary sinuses discriminates biological sex in adults and to quantify classification performance. We conducted a retrospective observational study and randomly selected 108 CBCT scans from 150 eligible records (age 20-70 years, permanent dentition). Height, width, length, and volume were measured bilaterally from standardized multiplanar reconstructions; normality was assessed and sexes were compared using Student's t test. Males showed larger sinus volumes than females (right: 17.41 ± 1.61 vs 15.38 ± 1.79 cm³; left: 17.46 ± 1.37 vs 15.86 ± 2.02 cm³; p <0.001). In side-specific univariate linear discriminant analysis with 10-fold cross-validation, width was the best single predictor: right width AUC = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72-0.88) and accuracy = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.79); left width AUC = 0.74 (0.64-0.83) and accuracy = 0.68 (0.59-0.76). In multivariable models using width + age, linear discriminant analysis achieved AUC = 0.771 (95% CI: 0.676-0.858) and accuracy = 0.722 (95% CI: 0.631-0.798), with sensitivity = 0.729 (95% CI: 0.590-0.834) and specificity = 0.717 (95% CI: 0.592-0.815); logistic regression performed similarly (AUC = 0.771; accuracy = 0.713). Conclusions: CBCT-based morphometry of the maxillary sinus discriminates sex with moderate performance; width is the most informative single metric in this cohort. For forensic application, population-specific external validation and multivariable models integrating shape and volume descriptors are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yataco et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: