Key result
Limited left atrial surgical ablation resulted in similar sinus rhythm maintenance at 1 year compared to PVI alone (67% vs 81%, P=0.18), but significantly decreased left atrial transport function.
Why the study?
Does limited left atrial surgical ablation compared to PVI alone maintain left atrial function in patients undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery?
Population
72 patients scheduled for valve surgery and/or coronary revascularization with atrial fibrillation…
Comparison
Limited left atrial surgical ablation… vs Epicardial pulmonary vein isolation only…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
12 months
Authors
Loading...
May warrant caution with limited LA ablation in concomitant surgery; leaves open optimal strategies balancing rhythm and function.
Cohort (n=72)
Does limited left atrial surgical ablation compared to PVI alone maintain left atrial function in patients undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 67% vs 81%
p-value: p=0.18
Limited left atrial surgical ablation during cardiac surgery decreases left atrial function and compliance compared to PVI alone, despite similar rates of sinus rhythm maintenance.
Compier et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=72). Limited left atrial surgical ablation vs. Epicardial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) only was evaluated on Sinus rhythm maintenance at 1-year follow-up (p=0.18). Limited left atrial surgical ablation resulted in similar sinus rhythm maintenance at 1 year compared to PVI alone (67% vs 81%, P=0.18), but significantly decreased left atrial transport function.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: