Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Considerable variations in the scope and the methods of ascertainment employed in different epidemiological studies, to say nothing of divergent diagnostic criteria, have seriously jeopardized the value of many such observations in estimating the true prevalence of multiple sclerosis in various parts of the world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poskanzer et al. (1963) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: