Key result
Low internal health control plus psychological distress linked to ~12% higher insulin resistance.
Why the study?
To evaluate the hypothesis that low internal health locus of control and psychological distress are associated with insulin resistance.
Is the combination of low internal health locus of control and psychological distress associated with increased insulin resistance in adults without known diabetes or cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,439)
Yes
Is the combination of low internal health locus of control and psychological distress associated with increased insulin resistance in adults without known diabetes or cardiovascular disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The synergistic presence of low internal health locus of control and psychological distress is significantly associated with higher insulin resistance, suggesting a need for integrated psychological and lifestyle interventions.
AIM: To assess the hypothesis that low internal health locus of control (IHLC) and psychological distress (PD) are associated with insulin resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2002-2005, a random population sample of 2,816 men and women aged 30-74 years participated (76%) in two municipalities in southwestern Sweden. This study included 2,439 participants without previously known diabetes or cardiovascular disease. IHLC was measured by a global scale and PD was measured by the 12-item General Health Questionnaire. Insulin resistance was estimated using HOMA-ir. General linear models were used to estimate differences in HOMA-ir between groups with low IHLC, PD, and both low IHLC and PD, respectively. RESULTS: Five per cent (n = 138) had both PD and low IHLC, 62 per cent of participants (n = 1509) had neither low IHLC nor PD, 18 per cent (n = 432) had PD, and 15 per cent (n = 360) low IHLC. Participants with both low IHLC and PD had significantly higher HOMA-ir than participants with neither low IHLC nor PD (Δ = 24.8%, 95%CI: 12.0-38.9), also in the fully adjusted model (Δ = 11.8%, 95%CI: 1.5-23.0). Participants with PD had significantly higher HOMA-ir (Δ = 12%, 95%CI: 5.7-18.7), but the significance was lost when BMI was included in the model (Δ = 5.3%, 95%CI:0.0-10.8). Similarly, participants with low IHLC had significantly higher HOMA-ir (Δ = 10.1%, 95%CI: 3.5-17.0) but the significance was lost in the fully adjusted model (Δ = 3.5%, 95%CI: -1.9-9.3). CONCLUSIONS: Internal health locus of control (IHLC) and psychological distress (PD) were associated with insulin resistance. Especially individuals with both PD and low IHLC may need special attention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eriksson et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Without previously known diabetes or cardiovascular disease (n=2,439). Low internal health locus of control (IHLC) and psychological distress (PD) vs. Neither low IHLC nor PD was evaluated on Insulin resistance estimated by HOMA-ir (Δ = 11.8%, 95% CI 1.5-23.0, p=0.02). Participants with both low internal health locus of control and psychological distress had a higher insulin resistance (HOMA-ir) compared to those with neither condition.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: