Key result
Changing propagation directions from different endogenous pacemakers caused up to a 14% variation in conduction velocity and field potential parameters in cardiomyocyte monolayers.
Disregarding the spatial origin of excitation in cardiomyocyte monolayers may lead to misinterpretations of field potential parameters up to 14%.
May bias field potential interpretations by up to 14% in monolayers if origin ignored; leaves open effects in intact hearts.
The use of autonomous contracting randomly grown cardiomyocyte monolayers cultivated on microelectrode arrays (MEAs) represents an accepted experimental setting for preclinical experimental research in the field of cardiac electrophysiology. A dominant pacemaker forces a monolayer to adhere to a regular and synchronized contraction. Randomly distributed multiple pacemakers interfere with this dominant center, resulting in more or less frequent changes of propagation direction. This study aims to characterize the impact of changing propagation directions at single electrodes of the MEA on the four intrinsic parameters of registered field potentials (FPs) FPrise, FPMIN, FPpre, and FPdur and conduction velocity (CV) under normal and hypothermal conditions. Primary cultures of chicken cardiomyocytes (n = 18) were plated directly onto MEAs and FPs were recorded in a temperature range between 37 and 29°C. The number and spatiotemporal distribution of biological and artificial pacemakers of each cell layer inside and outside of the MEA registration area were evaluated using an algorithm developed in-house. In almost every second myocardial cell layer, interfering autonomous pacemakers were detected at stable temperatures, showing random spatial distributions with similar beating rates. Additionally, a temperature-dependent change of the dominant pacemaker center was observed in n = 16 experiments. A significant spread-direction-dependent variation of CV, FPrise, FPMIN, and FPpre up to 14% could be measured between different endogenous pacemakers. In conclusion, based on our results, disregarding the spatial origin of excitation may lead to misinterpretations and erroneous conclusions of FP parameters in the verification of research hypotheses in cellular electrocardiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kienast et al. (2014) studied In vitro cardiomyocyte electrophysiology (n=18). Changing propagation directions and hypothermia was evaluated on Field potential parameters (FPrise, FPMIN, FPpre, FPdur) and conduction velocity. Changing propagation directions from different endogenous pacemakers caused up to a 14% variation in conduction velocity and field potential parameters in cardiomyocyte monolayers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: