Key result
Distal coronary embolization following acute myocardial infarction significantly increased early infarct size at 3 days (18.8% vs. 14.5%) and late ventricular wall thinning at 6 weeks.
Why the study?
Does distal coronary embolization increase infarct size and alter ventricular remodeling in a porcine acute myocardial infarction model?
Does distal coronary embolization increase infarct size and alter ventricular remodeling in a porcine acute myocardial infarction model?
Distal coronary embolization in a porcine AMI model increases early infarct size and late ventricular wall thinning, highlighting the adverse remodeling effects of microvascular obstruction.
No immediate clinical implications from this porcine model; leaves open human relevance of embolization on post-MI remodeling.
BACKGROUND: Distal coronary embolization (DCE) of thrombotic material occurs frequently during percutaneous interventions for acute myocardial infarction and can alter coronary flow grades. The significance of DCE on infarct size and myocardial function remains unsettled. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of DCE sufficient to cause no-reflow on infarct size, cardiac function and ventricular remodeling in a porcine acute myocardial infarction model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Female Yorkshire pigs underwent 60 min balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by reperfusion and injection of either microthrombi (prepared from autologous porcine blood) sufficient to cause no-reflow (DCE), or saline (control). Animals were sacrificed at 3 h (n = 5), 3 days (n = 20) or 6 weeks (n = 20) post-AMI. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), serum troponin-I, and cardiac gelatinase (MMP) and survival kinase (Akt) activities were assessed. At 3d, DCE increased infarct size (CMR: 18.8% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.04; serum troponin-I: 13.3 vs. 6.9 ng/uL, p < 0.05) and MMP-2 activity levels (0.81 vs. 0.49, p = 0.002), with reduced activation of Akt (0.06 versus 0.26, p = 0.02). At 6 weeks, there were no differences in infarct size, ventricular volume or ejection fraction between the two groups, although infarct transmurality (70% vs. 57%, p< 0.04) and ventricular thinning (percent change in mid anteroseptal wall thickness:-25.6% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.03) were significantly increased in the DCE group. CONCLUSIONS: DCE increased early infarct size, but without affecting later infarct size, cardiac function or ventricular volumes. The significance of the later remodelling changes (ventricular thinning and transmurality) following DCE, possibly due to changes in MMP-2 activity and Akt activation, merits further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2015) studied Acute myocardial infarction (n=51). Distal coronary embolization (DCE) using autologous microthrombi vs. Sterile saline was evaluated on Infarct size at 3 days (percent of overall left ventricular mass) (p=0.04). Distal coronary embolization following acute myocardial infarction significantly increased early infarct size at 3 days (18.8% vs. 14.5%) and late ventricular wall thinning at 6 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: