Key result
Average heart rate sound resonance significantly increased RMSSD from 23.73 ms to 31.89 ms (p<0.05) during dynamic movement compared to no sound stimulation, indicating improved autonomic nervous system stability.
Why the study?
The study evaluated whether average heart rate sound resonance stimulation could enhance the stability and homeostasis of the autonomic nervous system to prevent imbalance caused by dynamic movement.
Does average heart rate sound resonance (aHRSR) improve the stability and homeostasis of the autonomic nervous system during dynamic movement in healthy adults?
Does average heart rate sound resonance (aHRSR) improve the stability and homeostasis of the autonomic nervous system during dynamic movement in healthy adults?
Sound stimulation matching an individual's average heart rate may help rapidly stabilize the autonomic nervous system and prevent imbalances during sudden postural changes.
May support aHRSR for ANS stability in healthy adults during movement; leaves open clinical translation and requires larger trials.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we explain the role of enhancing the stability and homeostasis of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) by proposing the average heart rate sound resonance (aHRSR), a sound stimulation to prevent imbalance of ANS due to dynamic movement. The effect of aHRSR on ANS was analyzed through the time and frequency domain of heart rate variability (HRV) using the photoplethysmogram data (PPG) of 22 participants (DUIRB-202109-12). METHOD: When the subjects performed dynamic movements that could cause changes in the ANS, HRV indicators using PPG data for 5 min before and after the movements were analyzed according to the presence or absence of aHRSR. The standard deviation of the NN intervals (SDNN), the square root of the mean squared differences of the NN intervals (RMSSD), low-frequency band (LF), and high-frequency band (HF), which represent sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve activity, were used as indicators, where SNDD and LF represent total ANS and sympathetic activity, while RMSSD and HF represent parasympathetic activity. RESULTS: As the effects of aHRSR on dynamic movement, the recovery time of RR interval was advanced by about 15 s, SDNN increased from ([44.16 ± 13.11] to [47.85 ± 15.16]) ms, and RMSSD increased from ([23.73 ± 9.95] to [31.89 ± 12.48]) ms (p < 0.05), increasing the stability of the ANS and reducing instability. The effect of homeostasis of the ANS according to aHRSR is also shown in reducing the change rate of LF from (-13.83 to -8.83) %, and the rate of change of HF from (10.59 to 3.27) %. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that aHRSR can affect the cardiovascular system by assisting physiological movements that occur during dynamic movement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2023) studied Healthy adults (n=22). Average heart rate sound resonance (aHRSR) vs. No sound stimulation was evaluated on Square root of the mean squared differences of the NN intervals (RMSSD) during standing posture (p=<0.05). Average heart rate sound resonance significantly increased RMSSD from 23.73 ms to 31.89 ms (p<0.05) during dynamic movement compared to no sound stimulation, indicating improved autonomic nervous system stability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: